Understanding Chargeback Rights Under Visa and Mastercard Rules

Banking Procedures9 min read

When a payment to a fraudulent entity has been made by credit or debit card, the chargeback mechanism provided by the card networks (primarily Visa and Mastercard) represents one of the most effective recovery pathways available to affected individuals. Chargebacks allow cardholders to dispute a transaction through their issuing bank, which then pursues the matter through the card network's dispute resolution process. This article explains how chargebacks work, the rules that govern them, and the practical steps involved in initiating a dispute.

What Is a Chargeback?

A chargeback is a reversal of a card payment initiated by the cardholder's issuing bank through the card network. Unlike a refund (which is initiated by the merchant), a chargeback is a dispute mechanism that forces the merchant's acquiring bank to respond to the claim. If the dispute is upheld, the transaction amount is returned to the cardholder.

Chargebacks were originally designed as a consumer protection mechanism to address unauthorised transactions, but they have evolved to cover a range of scenarios including fraud, non-delivery of goods or services, and misrepresentation.

Key Chargeback Reason Codes for Fraud Cases

Visa Reason Code 13.1 (Merchandise/Services Not Received): Used when the cardholder paid for goods or services that were never provided by the merchant.
Visa Reason Code 13.3 (Not as Described or Defective): Applicable when the service received materially differs from what was described at the point of sale.
Visa Reason Code 10.4 (Other Fraud - Card Absent Environment): Used for fraudulent transactions where the card was not physically present.
Mastercard Reason Code 4853 (Goods or Services Not Provided): Used when the cardholder did not receive the goods or services for which payment was made.
Mastercard Reason Code 4863 (Cardholder Does Not Recognise Transaction): Applied when the cardholder did not authorise or recognise the transaction.

Time Limits for Filing a Chargeback

Both Visa and Mastercard impose time limits on the filing of chargeback disputes. Generally, the cardholder has 120 calendar days from the transaction date (or from the expected delivery date for goods/services) to initiate a dispute with their issuing bank. The issuing bank then has a defined period to submit the chargeback to the card network.

It is critical to initiate the dispute process as quickly as possible. Delays reduce the likelihood of a successful outcome and may result in the claim falling outside the permissible time window.

The Chargeback Process

Step 1: Contact your card issuer. Report the transaction as fraudulent and request that a chargeback be initiated. Provide a detailed written account of what happened and all supporting evidence.
Step 2: Issuing bank review. Your bank reviews the claim and, if it meets the criteria, submits a chargeback to the merchant's acquiring bank through the card network.
Step 3: Merchant response (representment). The merchant (or acquiring bank) has the opportunity to respond to the chargeback by providing evidence that the transaction was legitimate. This is known as representment.
Step 4: Network arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved at the representment stage, the card network may arbitrate the dispute. The network's decision is typically final and binding on both parties.
Step 5: Resolution. If the chargeback is upheld, the transaction amount is credited back to your card account. If it is rejected, you may have limited options for further appeal depending on the network's rules.

Evidence That Supports a Chargeback Claim

Transaction records showing the payment(s) made to the entity.
Correspondence with the entity demonstrating the nature of the service promised and the failure to deliver.
Screenshots of the platform, including any claims about regulation, returns, or services.
Evidence of withdrawal attempts that were blocked or ignored.
Regulatory warnings about the entity published by supervisory authorities such as ESMA, BaFin, FCA, or CySEC.
A chronological narrative of events from initial contact to the point at which the fraud became apparent.

Limitations and Practical Considerations

Chargeback outcomes are not guaranteed. The merchant can contest the chargeback during the representment phase, and fraudulent entities sometimes provide fabricated evidence of service delivery. The burden of evidence in a chargeback dispute can shift depending on the stage of the process.

Some card issuers are more experienced in handling fraud-related chargebacks than others, and the quality of the initial submission can significantly affect the outcome. A well-documented, clearly structured chargeback application that references the correct reason codes and provides compelling evidence is substantially more likely to succeed.

Key Takeaways

Chargebacks are a powerful consumer protection mechanism for card payments made to fraudulent entities.
File the dispute as soon as possible, ideally within days of discovering the fraud. The 120-day time limit is a maximum, not a recommended timeframe.
Use the correct reason code for your specific situation; this significantly affects how the dispute is processed.
Provide comprehensive evidence including transaction records, correspondence, screenshots, and regulatory warnings.
EFPG assists in preparing structured chargeback documentation that meets the evidentiary standards of card network dispute processes.

Need Advisory Support?

If you have been affected by financial fraud and require structured advisory support, submit your case for a free preliminary assessment.

Request Case Assessment